Get a structured AI peer review with feedback from subject-matter experts, combining the speed of AI with the accuracy of human review.
Our proprietary AI provides a fast, cost-effective review across 24 key journal checkpoints. Subject-matter experts then validate the AI's analysis, correct errors, and offer actionable feedback to enhance your manuscript.
A proprietary model trained on journal criteria evaluates your manuscript against 24 essential peer-review checkpoints , flagging issues in structure, evidence, clarity, and reporting.
Every AI finding is reviewed by a PhD or Master's subject-matter expert in your field. They validate, correct, and rewrite the feedback , so what you receive is expert, not automated.
Evaluate if the title is descriptive, concise, and reflects the content.
Review clarity and conciseness of the abstract and main findings.
Evaluate the literature review and the relevancy of citations.
Assess if primary and secondary objectives are clearly stated.
Check if conclusions are data-supported and include future research recommendations.
Check the appropriateness and clarity of tables, figures, and data.
Verify if study limitations and potential biases are clearly addressed.
Determine if the study is relevant and significant to the target audience.
Every criterion scored and explained with a specific revision recommendation.
A structured report , half AI scan, half expert commentary. Every checkpoint scored, every issue explained with a specific fix.
Title is descriptive but does not include the study organism or the method. Consider adding both, e.g. "Metatranscriptomic analysis of gut microbiome adaptation in [species]."
Primary and secondary objectives are clearly stated in the final paragraph of the introduction. No action needed.
Limitations section is missing sample-size caveats and does not acknowledge cross-species generalisability. Add 2–3 sentences addressing both , reviewers consistently raise this in the target journal.
Strong relevance to the target readership, but the introduction would benefit from a sentence connecting the finding to broader primate ecology.
Every checkpoint gets a score, a rationale, and an actionable fix , ready for revision.
AI scan across 24 journal checkpoints, validated by a subject-matter expert. Full structured report with per-criterion scoring and specific revision guidance.
Delivered in 4 days from manuscript receipt. Includes a structured report with per-checkpoint feedback and a prioritised revision list. No hidden add-ons.
Get A QuoteCommon next steps after a Lite review , pick the service that matches the biggest gap the report identified.
Comprehensive content editing by two subject-matter experts to enhance the manuscript's structure, logical flow, and transitions.
View service
Expedite journal submission by ensuring the accuracy and compliance of every detail of your submission.
View service
Ensure your manuscript meets 27 essential standards for submission , from structure, references, and anonymization, to compliance.
View serviceEvery review is validated by a PhD or Master's expert working in your discipline. Browse by field to see a sample of the reviewers who handle Peer Review Lite assignments.
Upload your manuscript. In four days you'll have a structured report across 24 checkpoints , AI-scanned, expert-verified, and ready for revisions.
*All third-party trademarks (including logos and icons) of journals/publishers referred to on this website remain the property of their respective owners. Use of third-party trademarks does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party trademarks are for identification purposes only and shall be considered fair use under The Trademarks Law. Purchase of our services does not guarantee acceptance or publication by any journal. Editor and expert images displayed on this website are of real individuals and are used with their consent.